LOS ANGELES (FOX 11) - A proposed ordinance that would make Los Angeles the largest city in America to ban the sale and manufacture of nearly all fur products was set for a final vote on Tuesday.
Los Angeles City Council was scheduled for a final approval at 10 a.m. after it was approved by a city council committee Feb. 6.
A ban would take effect two years after final approval of the ordinance, which was first proposed by Councilmen Paul Koretz and Bob Blumenfield.
The ban would cover apparel made in whole or in part of fur, including clothing, handbags, shoes, hats, earmuffs, jewelry and keychains. Only used fur products could be sold.
The ordinance would include some exemptions, including furs of animals trapped by California Fish and Game license holders.
“This is something that is not just a good legislative win, it’s a moral win,” Blumenfield said. “We feel like we’re evolving as a city as people to stop this kind of unnecessary cruelty.”
Blumenfield said there’s no reason to wear fur in 2018. “Certainly not in sunny Los Angeles,” he said.
“There’s nothing humane about raising an animal and killing it for unnecessary vanity,” Koretz said.
The effort to ban the sale of fur products in Los Angeles is part of a national movement, said Christina Sewell, campaign manager at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
“Millions of these animals are killed in the fur industry every year, and we’re just slowly chipping away at this progress here in the United States, and we won’t stop until every city in the U.S. is completely fur free,” Sewell said.
Neighboring West Hollywood along with Berkeley and San Francisco already have fur bans, although their ordinances differ in some specifics. West Hollywood’s law was changed to exempt fur from animals that are legally trapped under state law.
Major fashion companies, including Michael Kors, Armani and Gucci, have also moved away from using fur. Earlier this month, Burberry said it would stop selling real fur.
Activists condemn the fur industry as inhumane, contending that the animals are subject to brutal conditions and meet torturous deaths. A number of celebrities, including actresses Maggie Q and Joanna Krupa, as well as No Doubt bassist Tony Kanal, joined the news conference outside of Los Angeles City Hall to support the ban before the unanimous vote.
Keith Kaplan, spokesman for the Fur Information Council of America, a trade group for manufacturers and fur merchants, denied the accusations and said the City Council motion is being put forward on the basis of “lies and false studies.”
A fur ban in the city could have an economic impact, Kaplan said Monday.
“There’s a lot of fur sold in LA. It’s in over 500 designer collections, it’s on shoes, it’s on handbags,” he said. “So yes, it will have an impact on jobs, it will have an impact on tax revenues.”
Retail fur sales globally accounted for $35.8 billion, and the fur industry employed more than 1 million people in 2014, the latest year that figures were available from the industry, Kaplan said.
Koretz said the ban would clearly disrupt the industry, but the phase-out period will allow a smoother transition. “It’s overdue, and we have to do it today, and I think we will set an example for the rest of the country and the rest of the world,” he said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.